<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: A Camera For You Foodies, The Canon S90</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.foodiefixation.com/archives/3027/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.foodiefixation.com/archives/3027</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 15 May 2010 09:29:27 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: patient_zero</title>
		<link>http://www.foodiefixation.com/archives/3027/comment-page-1#comment-10747</link>
		<dc:creator>patient_zero</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Mar 2010 03:25:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.foodiefixation.com/?p=3027#comment-10747</guid>
		<description>The S90 has been in the back of my mind for a while with it&#039;s low light 2.0 aperture, manual override, image stabilization, among other specs and features.

My concerns about how it would perform in the field with real life subjects were quashed after viewing your tasty subject matter.

Thanks Kin, for your helpful review of the Canon S90.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The S90 has been in the back of my mind for a while with it&#8217;s low light 2.0 aperture, manual override, image stabilization, among other specs and features.</p>
<p>My concerns about how it would perform in the field with real life subjects were quashed after viewing your tasty subject matter.</p>
<p>Thanks Kin, for your helpful review of the Canon S90.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

